California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
Lipson v. Motel 6 Ridgecrest CA5
-ooOoo- Plaintiff and appellant Jonathan Lipson appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent G6 Hospitality LLC (G6) after the trial court granted G6’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment.
-
Jones v. Superior Court CA4/2
In this writ proceeding, Albert Jones, a habeas petitioner who was sentenced to death in 1996, challenges the trial court’s denial of his witness’s request under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 United States Code
-
Javan v. Khanof CA4/3
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Mercedeh Javan and Amin Khanof are a divorced couple who share one minor child. In April 2024, Khanof and Javan sought competing restraining orders against each other. Two months later, the trial court granted Khanof’s request for a five-year res…
-
Jackson v. Estate of Perry CA5
-ooOoo- State prison inmate Fred Jay Jackson is the plaintiff and appellant in this medical malpractice case. Defendant Dr. Jonathan Robert Perry passed away during the pendency of the action and was replaced by his estate. The Estate of Jonathan Robert Perry, M.D. (Dr. Perry’s e…
-
In re S.L. CA4/2
The juvenile court removed S.L. (minor, born July 2018) from parents’ custody and bypassed reunification services to defendant and appellant M.L. (father) pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(16) (parent required to
-
In re A.K. CA5
-ooOoo- * Before Franson, Acting P. J., DeSantos, J. and Guerra, J. INTRODUCTION In this juvenile dependency case, Anna K. (mother) appeals from the order terminating her parental rights as to her minor children, A.K. and M.K. (collectively, the children) (Welf. & Inst. Code, 1 §…
-
In re I.H. CA4/3
No appearance for the Minors. * * * I.H. (Father)1 appeals from orders denying his petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 3882 to modify prior orders and grant additional reunification services for his two sons. Father also appeals from orders terminating his parent…
-
In re O.M. CA5
-ooOoo- In this juvenile dependency case, T.M. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order as to his minor daughter, O.M. His sole contention on appeal is that the court erred by limiting his educational and developmental services decisionmaking rights (educati…
-
In re J.M. CA1/1
In re J.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. Petitioner, v. A176326 Respondent, (Marin County Super. Ct. No. JD0000090) Real Party in Interest.
-
In re David O. CA4/1
I. David O. appeals from a disposition order adjudicating him a ward of the juvenile court. Appellant argues the juvenile court lacked authority to commit him to a secure youth treatment facility (SYTF) because the assault that qualified him for an SYTF was not the most recent of…
-
In re L.R. CA4/1
In January 2026, the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) received a referral regarding then four-year-old L.R. and one-year-old Pal.R. and Pau.R due to a domestic violence incident.1 During the incident, individuals who did not know the parents observed S.G…
-
In re D.R. CA5
-ooOoo- * Before Levy, Acting P. J., Snauffer, J. and Guerra, J. Appellant David S. is the father of seven-year-old D.R. (the child), who is the subject of this dependency case. Father appealed from the juvenile court’s orders denying his motion to vacate, set aside, and strike j…
-
In re L.V. CA2/2
Mother E.S. and Father J.V. each appeal the order of the juvenile court exercising jurisdiction over their son L.V. under Welfare and Institutions Code1 sections 300 and 360. As substantial evidence supports the court’s decision, we affirm.
-
Georgianna v. Superior Court CA4/3
Sibylle Georgianna filed a notice of appeal after the trial court granted Thomas David Georgianna III’s motion to vacate dismissal of the marital dissolution petition he initiated.1 The dismissal was ministerially entered by the superior court clerk pursuant to a request for dism…
-
Gemigniani v. B-B Barry CA2/5
Appellant and defendant landlord B-B Barry, LP (B-B Barry), appeals from an order denying a special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.15 (the anti-SLAPP statute) entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent tenant Staci Gemigniani in this malicious prosec…
-
Galarza v. Super Center Concepts CA2/2
Plaintiff and appellant Mary-Carmen Galarza (appellant) appeals from a judgment following defendant and respondent Super Center Concepts, Inc.’s (respondent) successful motion for summary judgment. Appellant also appeals from the denial of her motion for reconsideration. Appellan…
-
Frink v. Manka CA3
Plaintiff Samuel E. Frink appeals from a judgment after trial finding in favor of defendant Paul J. Manka on all of plaintiff’s causes of action, which related to defendant’s alleged legal malpractice. Plaintiff argues the trial court committed error by finding he failed to demon…
-
First Team Real Estate v. Lewandowski CA4/3
* * * Time limits in civil trials are often utilized by trial courts to focus litigants and their attorneys on the most important evidence required to establish their claims and defenses, thereby minimizing the potential for wasting court time, the parties’ time, and the jurors’ …
-
Celious v. Engel CA2/8
INTRODUCTION This is plaintiff Aaron Celious’s second appeal arising out of the City of Los Angeles’s (City) solicitation of public contracts for two projects funded by the City. Celious is an independent contractor for a company that submitted unsuccessful contract proposals for…
-
Vu v. Vu CA6
This appeal, though from a civil action, arises from disputes between former spouses that were previously litigated during their marital dissolution proceedings. Plaintiff and appellant Phuong Vu (Phuong),1 representing herself, appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining def…