California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
In re A.C. CA2/6
J073571) (Ventura County) Petitioner and Respondent, v. Appellant. N.C. challenges the juvenile court’s order terminating her reunification services under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e)1. She contends the juvenile court
-
In re N.M. CA2/6
S.B. (mother) appeals from the orders of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights to N.M. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.1 She contends the juvenile court erred when it terminated her parental rights and failed to apply the parent-child benefic…
-
In re A.M. CA4/2
I. Defendant and appellant, K.G. (the Guardian) appeals the juvenile court’s orders terminating her guardianship over A.M. and removing A.M. from her custody. We
-
In re K.C. CA2/4
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 C.C. (father) appeals jurisdiction findings and disposition orders regarding his three children, H., R., and K. The juvenile court assumed jurisdiction pursuant to section 300, subdivision (b)(1). It removed father’s three children from his custody, placed the…
-
In re E.M. CA2/4
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Appellant G.M. (mother) challenges the juvenile court’s exit orders terminating jurisdiction over two of her children—E., born in 2020, and M., born in 2022—and granting custody to the children’s father. We affirm. This is mother’s second appeal from juvenile …
-
In re Sabrina J. CA4/3
No appearance for the Minor. * * * F.D. (the mother) appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights as to her daughter, Sabrina J., in this dependency matter. The mother’s sole argument is that the court improperly concluded that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA…
-
In re J.T. CA1/5
Appellant J.T. (appellant) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating probation unsuccessfully. Appellant’s counsel has raised no issue on appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (Anders v. Ca…
-
In re E.D. CA4/2
E.D. was detained from defendant and appellant T.D.’s (Mother)’s custody shortly after birth. After a contested jurisdictional and dispositional hearing held on July 9, 2025, the juvenile court formally removed E.D. from Mother’s custody
-
In re H.P. CA5
-ooOoo- Minor H.P. (minor) contends on appeal that the juvenile court’s disposition order must be reversed and the matter remanded because the court abused its discretion when it committed minor to Camp Erwin Owen. The People disagree. We affirm.
-
In re R.J. CA4/2
Parents M.J. (father) and B.R. (mother) appeal the reinstatement by the Riverside County juvenile court of the order terminating their parental rights as to R.J. (the child) following a remittitur hearing to ensure compliance with the inquiry provisions set forth
-
Hidey v. The Caprock Group, LLC CA4/3
Doris Jean Hidey sued Gregory Mech and The Caprock Group, LLC (Caprock) for multiple causes of action relating to allegedly improper management fees charged on her investment account with Caprock. Defendants moved to compel arbitration based on the arbitration provision in the in…
-
Franco v. Bamboo Ide8 Ins. Services, LLC CA4/2
Plaintiffs and appellants Marriette Franco and Jesse Lopez (collectively, Homeowners) sued defendants and respondents Bamboo Ide8 Insurance Services, LLC, and Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. (collectively, Insurers) for (1) breach of contract and
-
Creditors Adjustment Bureau v. Halajian CA5
-ooOoo- Defendant and appellant Barry Halajian (appellant), proceeding in pro. per., appeals the trial court’s entry of a default judgment against him in favor of respondent Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. Appellant broadly contends the default should have been set aside for ex…
-
Choi v. Los Altos School District CA6
In March 2018, Joung Yun Choi was injured when she tripped over a backpack left in the pickup area at an elementary school in Los Altos. Choi sued the Los Altos School District (District) claiming that the school’s practice of allowing students to leave backpacks in the pickup ar…
-
Yu v. 2908 Deakin Street Homeowners' Assn. CA1/5
Shek Lim Yu owned a unit at 2908 Deakin Street, in Berkeley, between 1991 and 2004. Twenty years later, he sued the 2908 Deakin Street Homeowners’ Association (the Association)—while represented by his daughter and attorney, Elizabeth Yu—alleging that he was falsely told, in 1996…
-
The Waffle v. Tucker Investment Group CA2/7
The Waffle, LLC appeals from a judgment in favor of William Tucker and Tucker Investment Group, LLC (TIG; collectively, the Tucker defendants) after the trial court granted the Tucker defendants’ motion to confirm an arbitration award in their favor and denied The Waffle’s motion…
-
Salazar v. CN Motor Co. CA2/8
Luis Antonio Salazar (Salazar) sued his employer, appellant CN Motor Company LLC, for violations of the California Labor Code and Business & Professions Code. CN Motor moved to compel arbitration of Salazar’s claims. The trial court denied the motion. CN Motor contends the partie…
-
P. v. Templar CA4/1
Ellis Templar appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for mental health diversion. He argues the evidence did not support the trial court’s finding that he posed an unreasonable risk to public safety. Templar further contends the trial court erred in using its residual dis…
-
P. v. Wandick CA5
-ooOoo- INTRODUCTION In connection with the shooting death of Daniell Williams on a Bakersfield highway, a jury convicted defendants Taeviyon Wandick and Denell James Martray King (collectively, defendants) of the following offenses: Count 1: First degree premeditated murder, com…
-
P. v. Lewis CA5
-ooOoo- A jury convicted defendant Javonna Leeshay Lewis of human trafficking, human trafficking of a minor for purposes of performing a commercial sex act, rape by penetration, torture, and pimping a minor. The jury also found true various allegations under Penal Code section 66…