California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
P. v. Garcia CA4/2
INTRODUCTION Defendant and appellant Andy Rey Garcia appeals from a postjudgment order denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code1 former section 1170.95.2 His
-
P. v. Berg CA1/2
We will reverse Thomas’s sentence and remand for resentencing and otherwise affirm.1 By joint information, the Sonoma County District Attorney charged Thomas and Berg with assaulting Angelo M. by means likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code,2 § 245, subd. (a)(4)) and al…
-
P. v. Ramirez CA2/8
Jose Ramirez shot and killed Eduardo Ruiz. The People charged Ramirez with first degree premeditated, willful, and deliberate murder, possession of a firearm by a felon, and unlawful possession of ammunition. A jury found Ramirez guilty as charged, rejecting his theory that he ki…
-
P. v. Maddox CA5
We accept the concession. I. Prosecution’s Case-in-chief Jane Doe is defendant’s second cousin. She “spent a lot of [her] childhood with him,” described their relationship as “very close,” and considered him “one of [her] favorite people.” Jane was molested by defendant for a six…
-
P. v. Wolfer CA1/5
Super. Ct. No. 02-25-01042) Defendant, Ross Wolfer, appeals from the trial court’s order authorizing the State Department of State Hospitals (DSH) to administer antipsychotic medication involuntarily pursuant to Penal Code section 1370.1 We affirm.
-
P. v. Chaidez CA4/1
22, subdivision (b)(1)(C) to instead be imposed under section 186.22, subdivision (b)(5), and modified to a 15-year minimum parole period as required by that subdivision. Chaidez opposes this request, contending that he was never
-
P. v. Stone CA1/5
Super. Ct. No. 20NF006622A) Mark Stone appeals after a jury convicted him of three lewd acts on a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a))1 and the trial court sentenced him to a 10-year prison term. Stone claims the trial court committed instructional error and th…
-
P. v. Henn CA2/3
Paul Henn was charged with, among other offenses, inflicting corporal injury on his girlfriend. He moved for mental health diversion under Penal Code1 section 1001.36. The trial court denied the motion, finding that Henn was eligible for diversion but unsuitable for it because he…
-
P. v. Osborn CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Tyler Dean Osborn asks this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant has not filed a supplemental brief. Finding no arguable error that would result i…
-
P. v. Villegas CA4/3
We agree. Third, Villegas claims that a recent California Supreme Court opinion clarified the rules for imposing fines and fees at sentencing, and that he is entitled to a remand so he can “challenge the imposition of any fine as constitutionally excessive under the federal and s…
-
P. v. Parry CA4/3
* * * After defendant Georgette Marie Parry failed to follow through on agreed conditions of a plea agreement, the trial court sentenced her to two years of formal probation. During the probation period, the prosecution moved to modify the previously ordered amount of victim rest…
-
Ogassian v. Ogassian CA2/1
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Helen M. Ogassian placed real and personal property into a trust which was revocable while she was alive but became irrevocable upon her death. While alive, Helen2 later disposed of all the property initially placed in the revocable trust such that the trust h…
-
Mijangos v. Pereira CA6
This appeal arises from an unlawful detainer action filed under Code of Civil Procedure,1 section 1161a, subdivision (b)(4) (section 1161a(b)(4)). Xochitl Mijangos brought suit against Teresa Pereira, asserting that Mijangos had purchased property from Pereira and Pereira’s ex-hu…
-
Melendez v. Stater Bros. Markets CA4/1
Theresa Melendez slipped and fell on a disinfectant wet wipe that had been discarded on the floor of a Stater Brothers Markets (hereafter, Stater Brothers) supermarket. She appeals a judgment entered in favor of Stater
-
Marriage of Raju CA4/3
* * * Sagaar K. Raju appeals from a judgment of reserved issues (judgment), wherein the trial court found that a piece of real property located in Irvine, California (the “Irvine property”) was the sole and separate property of respondent Nida Mirza Raju. Saagar contends substant…
-
Logan v. Sanders CA4/3
Plaintiff Ethan Logan1 appeals from the court’s orders granting special motions to strike (anti-SLAPP motion) under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.162 by defendants Nicholas A. Sanders, Trustee of the Joseph L. and Kathleen H. Sanders Family Trust dated January 28, 1986 (San…
-
K.R. v. J.C. CA3
J.C. appeals from a five-year restraining order prohibiting him from harassing K.R., his neighbor. J.C. contends (1) he was denied due process when the trial court heard related matters at a single hearing, and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in granting the restraining…
-
In re S.P. CA2/3
Mother challenges the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights under section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code1 as to her child S.P. (born December 2023). She argues the court erred in finding the beneficial parental relationship exception to the termination o…
-
In re A.A. CA5
-ooOoo- INTRODUCTION In this juvenile dependency case, C.A. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional findings and orders as to his two minor children, An.A. and Au.A. (collectively, the children). Father contends the juvenile court erred by (1) …
-
In re E.V. CA4/2
A.V. (mother) appeals from an order continuing the juvenile court’s jurisdiction over her minor children. She argues there was no substantial evidence supporting the trial court’s finding that the conditions leading to the dependency still existed, so it