California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
In re A.D. CA2/4
Mother Y.D. challenges the juvenile court’s order exercising jurisdiction over her six-year-old son, A., under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b).1 Mother and A.’s father, I.D., both challenge the juvenile court’s disposition ruling removing A. from mother…
-
In re A.C. CA2/4
Father N.C. appeals from the juvenile court’s disposition order denying him reunification services with his infant twin daughters, Ai. and Ad., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b).1 He argues that the court abused its discretion by concluding …
-
In re Silavong CA2/5
75, subdivision (f) excludes from resentencing individuals who were convicted of a sexually violent offense or sentenced to death or LWOP. Having examined the text and the legislative history of section 1172.75, subdivision (f), we conclude the Legislature
-
In re Delilah Z. CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ The juvenile court asserted dependency jurisdiction over two-year-old Delilah Z., removed her from her mother’s custody, and released her to Ricardo Z. (father), under the supervision of the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Service…
-
In re C.Q. CA3
L.W. (mother) appeals from a series of juvenile court orders, including the order terminating parental rights and freeing C.Q. (the minor) for adoption. Mother contends: (1) the notices for some of the hearings in this case were defective; (2) the El Dorado County Health and Huma…
-
In re W.L. CA6
In re W.L., a Person Coming Under the H053832 Juvenile Court Law. (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 24JD028283) Respondent,
-
In re J.F. CA2/3
Father appeals from the juvenile court’s juvenile custody order awarding sole legal and physical custody of J.F. to mother. He contends the juvenile court did not apply the best interests of the child standard; and substantial evidence did not support finding granting mother sole…
-
Gigena v. Finch CA3
Appellant Gabriel Gigena appeals the trial court’s order awarding appellate costs of $85.88, a substantial reduction from the amount he sought. Contrary to Gigena’s contentions, he is not entitled to costs he did not actually incur or to those outside the purview of the applicabl…
-
Conservatorship of N.S. CA3
(El Dorado) Conservatorship of the Person of N.S. C101409 R.C. et al., (Super. Ct. No. SP20190003) Petitioners and Appellants,
-
City of L.A. v. IBEW, Local 18 CA2/7
Beginning in 1980 the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP) and the City of Los Angeles (City) maintained a reciprocal retirement benefits arrangement (Reciprocity or the Reciprocal Arrangement). This arrangement allowed employees transferring between DWP and the City t…
-
Bian v. Li CA4/3
Defendants Zhenlong and Huiping Li appeal from an order denying their second motion for reconsideration. That order is nonappealable and defendants did not timely appeal from any appealable order. We therefore dismiss this appeal.
-
Barcelo v. Papaya Gaming CA2/2
Jane Barcelo and Christina Isernia (plaintiffs) filed a consumer class action against Papaya Gaming Ltd. and Papaya Gaming Inc. (Papaya) alleging that Papaya’s gaming website is fraudulent. Five individuals—namely, Daniel Golden, Barbara Miller, Jeremy Ghost, Kortni Koutrakos, an…
-
Tripathi v. Tesconi CA1/3
Defendant Raymond Tesconi appeals from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff Ashish Tripathi’s unopposed motion for summary judgment. Tesconi argues the shortened briefing schedule prevented him from opposing the motion, and Tripathi failed to establish the required elements…
-
S.B. v. J.R. CA3
Plaintiff father S.B. (father) and defendant mother J.R. (mother) were previously in a relationship and had a daughter together (the daughter).1 In April 2023, mother obtained a one-year domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against father. In October 2024, the trial court g…
-
Rupnow v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. CA2/8
MEMORANDUM OPINION Carmelita Rupnow contends the trial court erred in granting judgment on the pleadings without leave to amend and dismissing her lawsuit against Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-9, Mortgage Pass-Through…
-
P. v. Sanford CA3
Defendant Andrew Evan Sanford appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6 after the trial court issued an order to show cause.1 His appellate counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 1…
-
P. v. Zavala CA3
Defendant Angel Zavala told a police officer he was going to rape and kill her after she arrested him for public intoxication. Following a bench trial, the trial court found him guilty of criminal threats, threatening a public officer, misdemeanor battery on a peace officer, and …
-
P. v. Evans CA5
-ooOoo- Defendant was convicted of murder and conspiracy to commit murder on the theory that she instigated the killing of Dontae Lee by codefendant Louis Bell. She raises several challenges to her convictions, which we reject. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
-
P. v. Perez CA2/3
A jury convicted Eric Perez of first degree murder. Perez petitioned for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 The trial court denied the petition on the ground it was a successive petition. Perez appealed from the order denying his petition, his appellate counsel filed …
-
P. v. Feliz CA5
-ooOoo- INTRODUCTION In 2015, appellant Alfred Carl Feliz was convicted by jury of participation in a criminal street gang (Pen. Code,1 § 186.22, subd. (a)) and other crimes with gang enhancements (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)) attached. In 2025, he came before the court for recall and…