California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
He v. Metropolitan Transit System CA4/1
Wentian Zheng was struck and killed by a moving Amtrak train just after 4:00 p.m. on February 18, 2020. Zheng had just exited a trolley operated by the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and had attempted to cross the parallel tracks utilized by Amtrak at the Washington Street rai…
-
Falbo v. Parisi CA1/2
Tony Falbo and Corina Falbo (the Falbos) brought this wrongful death suit against William Parisi (Parisi), who was turning right at an intersection in a truck when he hit and killed their 20-year-old daughter on her bicycle. After a lengthy trial, a jury found Parisi was not negl…
-
EpicentRx v. Superior Court CA4/1
This is the second mandate petition to determine the correct forum for litigation between EpicentRx, Inc. (the Company) and several of its individual officers and employees (collectively, defendants) and one of the Company’s minority shareholders, EpiRx, L.P. (EpiRx). Defendants …
-
Clayton v. Canada CA1/5
Super. Ct. No. 21CV003448) In a dispute between neighbors, the trial court entered a judgment granting plaintiffs, Rupert Clayton and Miriam Pinchuk, an exclusive easement for gardening purposes over a portion of defendants’ property. Defendants, Herbert Canada and Bernadette Rod…
-
Burrise v. State Personnel Board CA3
(Sacramento) TIMMIYA BURRISE, C103154 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 24WM000069) v. Defendant and Respondent ORDER DENYING
-
Andraos v. Hayrapetyan CA2/7
INTRODUCTION Arkadi Hayrapetyan and Hollywood Entertainment Lounge, Inc. (collectively, Hayrapetyan)1 appeal from a trial court judgment in favor of commercial landlords George and Aftin Andraos (the Andraoses) in related unlawful detainer and breach of contract actions. After th…
-
Andraos v. Bissada CA2/2
Appellant John Andraos and respondent Lauren Bissada entered into a settlement agreement. Terms of the agreement included a provision that each would dismiss pending legal actions against the other. Andraos dismissed his civil action against Bissada with prejudice. Bissada, howev…
-
Alvarez v. ServiceMac CA2/1
Affirmed. Rodolfo Alvarez, in pro. per., for Cross-complainant and Appellant. Wright, Finlay & Zak and Joan C. Spaeder-Younkin for Cross-defendant and Respondent ServiceMac, LLC. Fidelity National Law Group and Josette D. Johnson for Cross-defendant and Respondent Homebridge Fina…
-
Advanced Orthopedic Center v. Regal Medical Group CA2/1
This is the second appeal concerning the anti-SLAPP1 motion of Regal Medical Group, Inc. and Lakeside Medical Organization (together, Regal) to strike portions of Advanced Orthopedic Center, Inc.’s (AOC) second amended complaint (the complaint). The complaint alleges that Regal b…
-
01 BH Partnership v. Bank of America CA2/1
In 2019, appellant 01 BH Partnership took title to a piece of real property in Los Angeles (the Property) that was subject to a deed of trust in favor of respondent Bank of America, N.A., as servicer for respondent Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Harborvi…
-
Wing Inflatables v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's CA1/1
Representations and warranties insurance is a specialized insurance product purchased in connection with certain corporate transactions, such as mergers and acquisitions. It indemnifies the insured for covered breaches in the representations and warranties of other parties to the…
-
Tillerson v. Nature Works Global CA4/1
Accordingly, we dismiss Tillerson’s cross-appeal as to Moran, Sculpture, and Global; reverse the judgment as to the negligent misrepresentation claim; and remand with directions to enter judgment in favor of Defendants.
-
P. v. Rose CA3
Defendant Dawn Lynette Rose pled guilty to carjacking, kidnapping, assault, and driving under the influence. On appeal, Rose contends the trial court abused its discretion by exercising its residual discretion to deny mental health diversion because the court’s reasons were incon…
-
P. v. Ramirez CA3
A jury found defendant Juan Alejandro Ramirez guilty of 18 of counts of lewd or lascivious acts upon or with a child who was under the age of 14 years, by use of “force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim or another person,” un…
-
P. v. King CA3
In 2025, defendant Leonard Michael King was resentenced under Penal Code section 1172.75.1 After striking his prior prison term enhancement, the trial court declined to further reduce King’s sentence. On appeal, King contends the trial court erred in imposing the upper term based…
-
P. v. Willis CA4/1
MEMORANDUM OPINION In this appeal, we accept the People’s proper concession that we must reverse for insufficient evidence of Charles Willis’s conviction in count 1 for
-
P. v. Archuleta CA4/2
INTRODUCTION Defendant Raymond Archuleta appealed from the trial court’s order finding he was ineligible for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.75 after the California
-
P. v. Ciceu CA3
Following remand from this court for a full resentencing, the trial court sentenced defendant Bryon David Ciceu to an aggregate term of 16 years eight months for burglary, corporal injury to a cohabitant or person in a dating relationship, criminal threats, assault with a deadly …
-
P. v. Autman CA4/1
We reject Autman’s assertion that insufficient evidence supported the convictions. However, we agree with Autman and the Attorney General that the electronic search condition is overbroad and remand for the trial court to modify the condition to more closely meet the rehabilitati…
-
P. v. Blakely CA4/2
Defendant and appellant Stephon Blakely appeals the judgment after a jury convicted him of four felonies and one misdemeanor and found true two firearm enhancements. We affirm. Defendant was charged by amended information with murder (Pen. Code1, § 187,