California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
In re G.C. CA5
-ooOoo- B.C. (mother) and G.J. (father) appeal from the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 366.26) as to their daughter G.C. (the child). Mother raises no issues from the termination order.2 Instead, she requests judicial notice of her earl…
-
In re Noel N. CA4/3
* * * N.J. (Mother) brought her six-month-old child Levi N. (Levi) into a hospital with two broken arms. The Orange County Social Services Agency (the Agency) received a referral regarding possible child abuse. The Agency took Levi, and his two-year-old brother Noel N. (Noel), aw…
-
HTL Automotive v. 1351 Orizaba Avenue CA2/8
The trial court appointed a receiver to enforce the judgment in this case. Within a few months, the judgment debtors settled with the creditor. The court approved payment of the receiver from funds held by the receiver. The judgment debtors attack this approval. We affirm.
-
Federal Ins. Co. v. Reyes-Cano CA3
Defendant Guadalupe Reyes-Cano was driving his employer’s truck when he was struck and injured by a vehicle driven by an employee of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). Reyes-Cano received workers’ compensation benefits through his employer’s insurer, plaintiff Federal Insurance Com…
-
Cortez v. Marmolejo CA4/1
After a bench trial, Daniel Cortez prevailed against Ruby Marmolejo (Ruby) and Christopher Marmolejo (Christopher) on his causes of action for financial abuse of an elder (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15610.30) and quiet title (Code Civ. Proc., § 760.020 et seq.), and against Ruby alone…
-
City of South Gate v. South Gate Investment Group CA2/2
Cross-defendant South Gate Investment Group, Inc. (SGIG) appeals the trial court’s order directing it to pay attorney fees of cross-complainant City of South Gate (the City) under South Gate Municipal Code section 11.51.100 (Section 11.51.100) after the City obtained a judgment d…
-
Chang v. Pilot Travel Centers CA2/7
Plaintiffs1 appeal from the order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained Pilot Travel Centers, LLC’s demurrer to their complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs contend the court erred by refusing to construe their post-dismissal motion for reconsideration as a m…
-
Burrise v. State Personnel Board CA3
(Sacramento) TIMMIYA BURRISE, C103154 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 24WM000069) v. Defendant and Respondent Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
-
Bracamonte-Garcia v. County of Sonoma CA1/3
No. SCV269312) Xochitl Luna Bracamonte-Garcia, a minor, through her father and guardian ad litem Jimmy Garcia, sued Sonoma County (County). She alleged it acted negligently by failing to warn her mother, Sylvia Bracamonte, a social worker at a foster care facility, about the dang…
-
Acevedo v. Country Lake MHC CA4/2
I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs and respondents are residents who reside within a mobilehome park owned or operated by defendant and appellant Country Lake MHC, GP, LLC. This
-
Abillar v. Dignity Community Care CA3
Plaintiff Alberto Abillar appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Dignity Community Care, doing business as Methodist Hospital (hospital), after the trial court denied Abillar’s sixth continuance request and granted hospital’s summary judgment motion. Abillar contends the t…
-
Southern Counties Express v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters CA2/8
Amidst a labor dispute, the trial court issued a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction enjoining a union from blocking ingress and egress at an employer’s facilities. The union challenges both orders, arguing the temporary restraining order was overbroad and vi…
-
Shayan Capital, LLC v. Shakib CA2/1
Defendant and appellant Ebby Shakib appeals from a judgment the trial court entered against him after granting plaintiff and respondent Shayan Capital, LLC’s (Shayan Capital) summary judgment motion. We affirm.
-
Roman v. Lee CA4/3
* * * In this case, we assess whether a civil harassment restraining order was properly entered against Jeffrey Gihun Lee after he and Lisa Roman had an angry confrontation in the Irvine neighborhood where both reside. In keeping with our standard of review, we find the trial cou…
-
R.V. v. Los Angeles Unified School District CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Appellant R.V. sued respondent Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), alleging negligence and negligent supervision arising out of his claim that, in the early 1980’s, middle school teacher Rodolphe Demordaigle sexually abused him. R.V. claimed …
-
Peterson v. Mojdehi CA4/1
Ali Mojdehi appeals the trial court’s order under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 425.16) granting in part and denying in part his special motion to strike claims asserted by Kim Peterson and Kim Funding, LLC (Kim Funding) (collectively, plaintiffs). The trial court g…
-
Park v. California Dept. of Justice CA1/4
Plaintiff Greigory Park appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the California Department of Justice (Department). The court entered judgment after sustaining the Department’s demurrer to Park’s complaint challenging on equal protection grounds the statutory requireme…
-
P. v. Dean CA1/4
SCUKCRCR2020365561, SCUKCRCR2020371031) Lamont Alexander Dean was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape (Pen. Code,1 § 220, subd. (a)(1)) and a separate offense of bringing drugs into a jail (§ 4573.6, subd. (a)). He admitted one prior strike allegation. (§§ 667, subds.…
-
P. v. Fisher CA1/5
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Defendant Timothy Fisher appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6 at the prima facie stage.2 His appointed counsel on appeal filed a brief identifying no arguable issues and requesting that we c…
-
P. v. Williamson CA3
Defendant Vanessa Kay Williamson challenges the trial court’s summary denial of her petition for resentencing under Penal Code1 section 1172.6. This matter is before us on transfer from our Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of People v. Morris (2026) 19 Cal.5th 671, whic…