California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
P. v. Scott CA4/3
* * * Defendant Kevin Robert Scott appeals the trial court’s decision revoking his probation and sentencing him to three years, the upper term, on his conviction for possessing child or youth pornography. (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a).)1 In this appeal, Scott contends he did no…
-
P. v. Sison CA4/1
Jefferson Sison appeals from an order denying his petition for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.61 after an evidentiary hearing. Sison asserts that we should independently review the petition under a de novo standard of review, and, regardless, that there was
-
P. v. Fuentes CA4/3
Alejandro Fuentes appeals from the denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 The trial court denied the petition after issuing an order to show cause and conducting a hearing. Based on the court’s review of Fuentes’s original trial record and addit…
-
P. v. Carroll CA1/4
A jury convicted defendant Joseph Carroll of three counts of murder, three counts of attempted murder, one count of assault with a firearm, three counts of possessing a firearm with a felony conviction, and one count of shooting at an occupied motor vehicle, and returned true fin…
-
Napier v. Dell CA4/3
* * * This is an appeal from a judgment following the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Dell, Inc. (Dell) and against plaintiff Marti A. Napier in a breach of contract case. The court determined the contract was between Dell and Napier’s corpo…
-
Miri v. AlignerCo Corp. CA1/1
23CV030735) MEMORANDUM OPINION1 This case returns to us on appeal from an order granting in part a motion to tax costs. In our prior opinion (Miri v. AlignerCo Corp. (July 10, 2025, A172220) [nonpub. opn.]),2 we affirmed an order granting a motion for terminating sanctions and th…
-
Mendoza v. LeBaron CA4/1
Liana Noreen LeBaron appeals a postjudgment order awarding her a portion of her requested additional attorney fees and costs. The order came after LeBaron conducted a judgment debtor exam of Jennifer Lynn Mendoza to collect attorney fees after LeBaron’s partially successful anti-…
-
Marriage of Allen CA1/1
In re the Marriage of DARINKA ALLEN and ERIC ALLEN DARINKA ALLEN, A173233 Appellant, (Contra Costa v. Super. Ct. No. MSD-15-01381)
-
Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2
Filed 6/1/26 Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2 (unmodified opinion) California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not be…
-
Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2
Filed 6/1/26 Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2 (unmodified opinion) California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not be…
-
Marriage of M.D.N. and A.D.N. CA1/4
In re Marriage of M.D.N. and Plaintiff and Appellant, A171022 v. A.D.N., (San Francisco City & County Defendant and Super. Ct. No. Respondent. FDI13780367)
-
Marriage of A.G. and C.G. CA4/3
No appearance by Respondent. C.G. filed an ex parte request for emergency temporary orders to modify existing child custody and visitation orders in this family law case. Her request was brought on grounds her former spouse, A.G., violated the terms of such orders and had engaged…
-
Kumar v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. CA1/2
In January 2021, Sudarshan Kumar discovered mold caused by a leaky water heater in the garage of his rental property and submitted a claim to his property insurer, Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century). After investigating, Mid-Century issued partial payment and “clos[ed Ku…
-
J.R. v. L.A. Unified School Dist. CA2/1
J.R. (J.R.) sued respondent Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), alleging an LAUSD employee sexually abused him while he was a student in the district. The trial court granted LAUSD’s summary judgment motion on the basis that J.R. had failed to name the district employee …
-
In re R.R. CA4/2
C.R. is the biological mother of seven-year-old R.R.H. (R.)1 and 15-year-old S.R.H (S.).2 A.H. is their adoptive mother.3 Each mother has filed an appeal of the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights following a hearing pursuant to
-
In re J.J. CA1/4
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 T.J. (father) and P.J. (mother) appeal from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders regarding their child J.J. (minor), whom they adopted after earlier dependency proceedings involving minor’s biological parents. Father and mother contend …
-
In re Dixon CA1/4
(Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18.) We conclude that the jury was not properly instructed on the kill zone theory but that the error was not prejudicial. Accordingly, we deny the petition. In January 2012, Dixon was convicted of assault with a firearm on Samuel King (Pen.…
-
In re A.E. CA4/3
No appearance for the Minors. * * * S.E. (the mother) appeals from an order terminating parental rights over her two daughters1 following a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.262 (the permanency planning hearing). The mother’s sole argument on appeal is…
-
In re J.A.-M. CA1/1
25JD00032, 25JD00033) In this appeal, F.S. (Father) challenges the orders made at the detention hearing, a restraining order hearing, and the combined jurisdiction/disposition hearing.1 He contends those orders are void because they were made by a commissioner without the parties…
-
In re E.C. CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Appellant S.C. (mother) appeals from a juvenile court order at the six-month review hearing that terminated her family reunification services. We affirm the order.