California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
In re C.C. CA1/2
At a six-month review hearing, the juvenile court terminated reunification services for L.D., the mother (hereafter, mother) of now five- year-old C.C., after she failed to participate in any of the services provided by her case plan and did not visit C.C. Mother now appeals, arg…
-
In re E.M. CA3
Appellant, mother of the minors, appeals from the juvenile court’s orders terminating parental rights, freeing the minors P.C., K.C., and E.M. for adoption. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395; undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Mother co…
-
In re N.V. CA4/2
I. Defendant and appellant, J.B. (Mother) appeals the juvenile court’s findings and orders asserting jurisdiction over her minor children, N.V. and M.B., and removing them
-
In re M.S. CA4/2
Defendants and appellants, J.P. (Father) and L.S. (Mother) appeal the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights to their minor child, M.S.-D, and the court’s orders summarily denying their Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions
-
In re J.J. CA4/2
Presumed father L.J. (father) appeals from the orders of the San Bernardino County juvenile court asserting jurisdiction over two of his children, R.J. (born in May 2019) and J.J. (born in April 2023), and bypassing provision of family reunification
-
Hogan v. Miller Barondess CA4/3
* * * This is an appeal from a judgment following the trial court’s ruling confirming an arbitration award between plaintiffs Roger T. Hogan, Roger P. Hogan (Roger Jr.), HFP, Ltd., Cathie Hogan, Kyle R. Hogan, Stephen Hogan, Hogan SRK, Inc., and R & C Motor Corporation (collectiv…
-
DC Modesto, LLC v. Sarkis CA5
-ooOoo- Defendant and appellant Angilbert Sarkis appeals from an order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs and respondents DC Modesto, LLC doing business as Levels, CV Merced, Inc., and CV McHenry, Inc. (collectively, plaintiffs). We reverse.
-
Civil Rights Department v. City of Torrance CA2/1
Plaintiff Civil Rights Department (CRD) is investigating whether defendant City of Torrance (Torrance or the City) has violated Government Code section 12952,1 the Fair Chance Act, which restricts the circumstances in which an employer may decline to hire a prospective employee d…
-
Benford v. Johnson CA1/3
Candace Benford appeals from an order denying her request for a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against Ahmari Johnson, her ex- boyfriend. She argues the trial court failed to assess the totality of the circumstances as required by the Domestic Violence Prevention Act …
-
Bacelar v. Sill CA2/7
Melissa Bacelar, Wagmor Pets, and Wylder’s Holistic Pet Center, Inc. (collectively, Plaintiffs) sued Kim Sill, Faith Ballin, Shelter Hope Enterprises, Inc. (Shelter Hope), and Matt Friedman (collectively, Defendants) for defamation. The trial court granted Defendants’ separate sp…
-
Avigai Hoping Media, LLC v. Signature Payments, LLC CA4/3
Defendants Signature Payments, LLC, North American Bancard, LLC, and Fresno First Bank appeal from an order denying their motion to compel arbitration. They contend the trial court wrongly reached the issue of unconscionability because the arbitration agreement delegated that iss…
-
A.J. v. Super. Ct. CA4/2
A.J. (mother) petitions for an extraordinary writ after the juvenile court terminated reunification services for most of her children and bypassed them for her remaining child. Mother disputes the court’s finding that terminating reunification services was
-
Vallejo v. Flynn Restaurant Group CA3
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. Plaintiff Cheryl Vallejo sued defendants Apple American Group LLC, a subsidiary of Flynn Restaurant Group LP, and Domingo Riego (collectively, defendants) alleging sexual harassment, discrimination, wage-and-…
-
Schupbach v. So. Cal. Regional Rail Authority CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff Matthew Schupbach is a participant in a public employee retirement plan maintained by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA). He sued SCRRA, its board of directors, and a third party for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding a…
-
Salmer v. Southern Cal. Permanente Medical Group CA4/1
Jennifer Slamer and Christopher Slamer appeal the order granting the motion of Southern California Permanente Medical Group (SCPMG) for reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits it had paid Jennifer. SCPMG sought to recoup those benefits from proceeds of a settlement the Sl…
-
Ross v. Goldberger CA1/3
A174791; Ross v. Goldberger
-
Rose v. Rose CA2/1
In 2023, plaintiff Victoria Rose filed this action for quiet title, partition, and other causes of action against her father James Rose and his then-girlfriend, now wife, Regina Rose. Victoria sought to enforce provisions in a 2016 dissolution judgment between her mother and Jame…
-
P. v. Mukhammadiyev CA5
-ooOoo- Defendant and appellant Osman Mukhammadiyev appeals following conviction and sentencing for rape by force or fear and false imprisonment. (Pen. Code, §§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 236.)1 As discussed below, we find three claims presented by defendant’s retained appellate counsel …
-
P. v. Cole CA4/2
INTRODUCTION Defendant and appellant Jamar Cole appeals the trial court’s judgment, after pleading no contest to carjacking. (Pen. Code1, § 215, subd. (a).) We affirm.
-
P. v. Belloso CA2/7
In 2018 a jury convicted Juan Luis Belloso of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger. (Pen. Code,1 § 21310.) On appeal, Belloso argued there was insufficient evidence to establish his stainless steel knife with a four-inch fixed blade was a dirk or dagger.2 Belloso also asserted the…