California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
L.H. v. County of San Diego CA4/1
L.H. filed a revival action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 340.1 alleging that she was sexually abused while placed in a foster home (the Foster Home), under the legal custody, care and control of the County of San Diego (the County). L.H. asserts that the County was direc…
-
Kurwa v. Physician Associates etc. CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Badrudin Kurwa, on behalf of himself and derivatively on behalf of Trans Valley Eye Associates, Inc. (Trans Valley), appeals from a judgment following a bench trial in favor of defendants and respondents Mark Kislinger, Mark B. Kislinger, Ph.D., M.D., Inc.…
-
Kramer v. Quality Loan Service Corp. CA1/1
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 According to appellant Robert Kramer’s first amended complaint, Kramer submitted to respondent trustee (Quality Loan Services Corporation) two bids for Kramer’s former property in Oakland, under Civil Code section 2924m, subdivision (c)(4)(A);2 but in the cour…
-
Kenne v. Community Corp. of Santa Monica CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ This appeal—appellant Kathleen Kenne’s third— challenges a postjudgment order awarding defendants approximately $35,000 in appellate attorney fees. We find no error, and thus we affirm.
-
Isolate Innovations v. Lisenko CA4/1
Isolate Innovations, LLC appeals the judgment entered against it after the trial court granted Anthony Lisenko’s motion for summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds. Resolving this matter by memorandum opinion (see generally People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847), …
-
In re Mateo V. CA1/4
M.M. (mother) appeals from the order terminating her parental rights to her now two-year-old son, Mateo. She contends the court erred by denying her request for a bonding study and in failing to apply the sibling relationship exception to the termination of parental rights. We fi…
-
In re A.F. CA4/2
S.F. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s February 2026 order at the permanent plan selection and implementation hearing terminating parental rights to A.F. (born in September 2024; hereafter Minor), the daughter he conceived with J.W.
-
In re C.B. CA1/4
In this juvenile wardship proceeding under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, the juvenile court found that C.B. committed the offenses of battery with injury on a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 243, subd. (c)(2)), battery on a (second) peace officer (id., § 243, subd. (b)),…
-
In re M.P. CA2/6
T.F. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights to her four-year-old daughter, M.P., and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 366.26.) Mother contends the court erred in finding the parental benefit exception did …
-
In re J.R. CA3
Minor J.R. appeals from a juvenile court judgment finding he violated Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a) five times. He contends two of the counts are not supported by substantial evidence. We conclude substantial evidence supports all five violations.
-
In re J.J. CA2/7
Mother Latricia M. appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdiction findings and disposition orders declaring her three children dependents of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300.1 Mother contends there was insufficient evidence of harm or potential harm…
-
In re K.G. CA2/5
—————————— K.G. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s finding of jurisdiction over her five children based on an incident of domestic violence between mother and F.L. (father).1 Because father pled no contest to the allegations in the Welfare and Institutions Code section 30…
-
In re A.F. CA2/5
A.F. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s October 16, 2025, finding at a 12-month review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.22, subdivision (f), that defendant and respondent Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) had…
-
In re J.B. CA4/2
B.W. (mother) appeals from an order denying her petition for additional family reunification services and liberalized visitation with J.B. (the child) pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 388, and from an order terminating her parental rights to
-
Hensley v. Hensley CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ James Hensley (James) appeals from a December 5, 2024 order granting a motion to compel filed by his former spouse, Midori Hensley (Midori), and awarding Midori sanctions of $6,750. We affirm.
-
Goodsell v. Bakersfield Memorial Hospital CA5
-ooOoo- INTRODUCTION Appellant Gregory Goodsell appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of respondent Bakersfield Memorial Hospital (Hospital) and against Goodsell after the trial court sustained Hospital’s demurrer to Goodsell’s first amended class action complaint…
-
Estate of Bates CA1/2
Estate of MARY ESTHER BATES, Deceased. TYEHIMBA KOKAYI, as Administrator of the Estate A174159 Petitioner and Respondent, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RP21094469)
-
Cupid v. Lyons-White CA2/7
Sabrina Cupid appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing without prejudice her petition for a civil harassment restraining order and the subsequent order awarding attorney fees to Tracey Michelle Lyons-White.1 Cupid contends the court erred by continuing the hearing on her p…
-
Conservatorship of D.A. CA2/5
Appellant D.A. appeals the trial court’s order granting respondent Los Angeles County Office of the Public Guardian’s (Public Guardian’s) petition for appointment as D.A.’s conservator. The order was made following a jury trial that resulted in a finding that D.A. was gravely dis…
-
CBD Franchising v. One Day Doors & Closets CA2/2
Plaintiff CBD Franchising, Inc. (CBDF) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on its complaint against defendants One Day Doors & Closets, Inc., and One Day Enterprises, LLC (together, One Day). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.