California Court of Appeal unpublished opinions (not citable under CRC 8.1115).
-
Mueller v. Schneider's Automotive CA2/6
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX GERHARD S. MUELLER, 2d Civil No. B350736 (Super. Ct. No. Plaintiff and Appellant, 2023CUPL015308) (Ventura County) v. SCHNEIDER’S AUTOMOTIVE, Defendant and Respondent. We exercise considerabl…
-
Marriage of Perez CA3
(Sacramento) In re the Marriage of CARLOS ERNESTO and C104512 (Super. Ct. No. 20FL04398) Appellant, v. Respondent. At a mandatory settlement conference, husband Carlos Ernesto Perez and wife Jessica Rebeca Perez agreed to set aside a default judgment of dissolution entered more t…
-
Marriage of Conte and Bailey CA6
In re the Marriage of BARBARA CONTE H053037 and MICHAEL BAILEY. (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 2011-6-CP-000794) Respondent, v. Appellant. Former spouses Michael Bailey and Barbara Conte are engaged in a long-running family law dispute over child custody and child support. Ba…
-
Internet Connectivity Group v. Manchester Financial Group CA4/3
Plaintiff Internet Connectivity Group, Inc. (ICG) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants Douglas Manchester (Manchester), Manchester Financial Group, L.P. (MFG), and Cloverleaf Media, LLC (CM and, together with Manchester and MFG, the Manchester Defendants) on ICG…
-
In re A.S. CA4/2
INTRODUCTION S.P. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 366.26) as to her child, A.S. (the child). Mother contends the
-
In re Z.C. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant E.C. (Father) appeals the jurisdictional orders adjudicating his two sons, Z.C. (born September 2010), and B.C. (born April 2012), as dependents of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300,
-
In re A.H. CA5
-ooOoo- * Before Detjen, Acting P. J., Franson, J. and DeSantos, J. J.P. (mother) is the mother of Andrew H., Michael H., and L.H. (collectively, “the children”), who are the subjects of this dependency case. Mother appealed from a juvenile court order terminating its jurisdictio…
-
In re Neena A. CA2/7
Mildred N. appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdiction findings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b)(1),1 and disposition orders declaring her daughter, Neena A., a dependent child of the court, removing Neena from Mildred, and requiring mo…
-
In re D.S. CA4/1
R.S., father of D.S. (Father R.S.), and A.R., father of L.R. (Father A.R.), appeal from the juvenile court’s February 6, 2026 orders following a combined jurisdiction and disposition hearing. Their sole contention is that the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Age…
-
In re N.R. CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ K.P. (mother) appeals the juvenile court’s order at the six- month review hearing in a dependency case concerning her daughters, N.R. and N.P. The court found that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) had provided o…
-
In re J.C. CA5
-ooOoo- Defendant J.C. appeals from a decision transferring his murder case from juvenile court to adult criminal court. J.C. asserts the trial court lacked substantial evidence to support its decision to transfer the case. We disagree. The record in this case contains substantia…
-
In re J.A. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant G.A. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional finding pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 300. Father is challenging only his waiver of his right to a contested jurisdictional hearing, asserting
-
Castelan v. 716 Yale Terrace CA2/4
Plaintiff and respondent Ninsi Castelan is a tenant in an apartment building for low-income individuals and families in Los Angeles. The building was developed with government financial assistance in exchange for the recordation of a covenant limiting the rents that can be charge…
-
Canela v. Superior Court CA3
(San Joaquin) LUIS CANELA, C104351 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. Nos. STK-CV-UOE- v. 2023-0000244, STK-CV-UOE- 2023-0002726)
-
Aud v. RRT Enterprises CA2/7
INTRODUCTION Betsy Jentz sued RRT Enterprises LP doing business under the name Country Villa Wilshire Convalescent Center and related entities for violating the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600 et seq., the Elder Abuse Act), violat…
-
Arriola v. City of Oakland CA1/4
In this Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) action, Plaintiff Orlando Arriola appeals from the trial court’s sustaining of a general demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. Arriola alleged that the defendants in the case, including respondent City of O…
-
Soltanabadi v. Aminpour CA2/1
INTRODUCTION After having judgment entered against him for approximately $4.86 million in a business dispute, Ahmad Soltanabadi turned around and sued persons and entities involved in that same business: Ataollah Aminpour, Michael Aminpour, Daniel Aminpour, MD Management 55, Inc.…
-
Save Mount Diablo v. City of Pittsburg CA1/2
Plaintiff and Respondent, A167589 v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al., (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. CIVMSN21-0462) Defendants and Appellants; DISCOVERY BUILDERS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.
-
Royer v. Los Rios Community College Dist. CA3
This case comes back to us a second time, following a remand to the trial court to take further action on a special motion to strike filed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (hereafter section 425.16 or the anti-SLAPP statute).1 Tina Royer sued her employer, the L…
-
Reyes v. South Cord Holdings CA2/8
Ysenia Reyes worked as an assistant manager at two stores owned by Catalyst dba South Cord Holdings, LLC. After her employment ended, she sued South Cord and related entities for harassment, discrimination, and other causes of action. We refer to the appellants collectively as So…