legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Details

Previous Listing
Description Court must conduct ex parte in camera review of sealed affidavit that defendant submits in support of his motion to discover police personnel records pursuant to Evidence Code Sec. 1043. Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for discovery of police records--without first holding in camera review of whether disclosure would violate constitutional rights or attorney-client privilege--on basis that he refused to provide opposing party with unredacted copy of sealed supporting declaration under protective order.
Ownership scott
Views 587 views. Averaging 0 views per day.
Similar Listings
Cooley v. Superior Court (Greenstein) - filed June 26, 2006, Second District, Div. One
Pfizer v. Superior Court (Galfano)
Local Rules for Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California
Calexico Hospital Management Group, LLC, v. State of California, et al., Imperial County Superior Court Case No. L-00074
John B. v. Superior Court (Bridget B.) - filed July 3, 2006, Cite as 2006 SOS 3418
Submission Date 07/03/06

scott's Membership Status

Registration Date: Sep 25, 2005
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 78 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 01/31/19 - 08:51:30

Biographical Information

Location: San Diego, California
Homepage: http://www.mcmillanlaw.us
Occupation: Lawyer
Birthdate: December 8, 1963 (56 years old)

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Find all listings submitted by scott

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2020 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2020 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale