legal news

Register | Forgot Password


Description Trial court did not abuse discretion by imposing evidence and issue preclusion sanctions against party for engaging in a pattern of discovery violations in connection with deposition notices and document production requests, resulting in the loss of important evidence in products liability case, even though no court orders were violated. Any error in imposing evidence sanction was harmless in absence of showing that sanctioned party would likely have obtained a more favorable verdict if excluded evidence had been admitted. Special instruction telling jury that defendant had attempted to conceal evidence from being used at trial, and that the jury could consider that fact in determining what inferences to draw from the evidence as it related to the issue to which that evidence related, was proper where defendant acted intentionally and in bad faith. Because trial court imposed discovery sanctions after it had summarily adjudicated plaintiff’s punitive damages claims in defendant’s f
Ownership scott
Views 698 views. Averaging 0 views per day.
Similar Listings
Firestone v. Hoffman - filed June 29, 2006, Second District, Div. One
Cooley v. Superior Court (Greenstein) - filed June 26, 2006, Second District, Div. One
John B. v. Superior Court (Bridget B.) - filed July 3, 2006, Cite as 2006 SOS 3418
June 4, 2021 Fresno's 3rd Responnse
Email Re Corrected Audio Filed
Submission Date 01/07/06

scott's Membership Status

Registration Date: Sep 25, 2005
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 78 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 21/07/21 - 07:38:53

Biographical Information

Location: San Diego, California
Occupation: Lawyer
Birthdate: December 8, 1963 (58 years old)

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Find all listings submitted by scott

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2022 The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2022 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.