legal news

Register | Forgot Password


Previous Listing
Description California published appellate decision holding that (1) All class members, not just the named plaintiff, must have been "injured in business and property" by the deception; (2) The "likelihood to deceive" standard no longer exists, because "by reason of" means that actual reliance on any deception must be proven; and that (3) Each class member must prove such actual reliance.

The court itself acknowledges that its decision would decimate private UCL litigation, but decides that Prop. 64's language compels that result.
Ownership scott
Views 590 views. Averaging 0 views per day.
Similar Listings
Williams v. Superior Court (City of Anaheim) Fourth District, Div. Three
Cooley v. Superior Court (Greenstein) - filed June 26, 2006, Second District, Div. One
Calexico Hospital Management Group, LLC, v. State of California, et al., Imperial County Superior Court Case No. L-00074
John B. v. Superior Court (Bridget B.) - filed July 3, 2006, Cite as 2006 SOS 3418
Local Rules for Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California
Submission Date 11/07/06

scott's Membership Status

Registration Date: Sep 25, 2005
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 78 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 21/07/21 - 07:38:53

Biographical Information

Location: San Diego, California
Occupation: Lawyer
Birthdate: December 8, 1963 (58 years old)

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Find all listings submitted by scott

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2022 The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2022 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.