legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Details

Description Where party sought to enforce subpoena duces tecum for business records against district attorney pertaining to documents prepared by local police department and California Highway Patrol that were in district attorney’s possession, court should have denied subpoena on ground that district attorney was not custodian of records within meaning of Evidence Code Sec. 1561 because district attorney and his subordinates were not able to attest to documents’ authenticity and trustworthiness as required by section.
Ownership scott
Views 517 views. Averaging 0 views per day.
Similar Listings
Cooley v. Superior Court (Greenstein) - filed June 26, 2006, Second District, Div. One
John B. v. Superior Court (Bridget B.) - filed July 3, 2006, Cite as 2006 SOS 3418
Firestone v. Hoffman - filed June 29, 2006, Second District, Div. One
Karlsson v. Ford Motor Company - filed June 27, 2006, Second District, Div. Eight
Williams v. Superior Court (City of Anaheim) Fourth District, Div. Three
Submission Date 07/01/06 (Edited 07/01/06)

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2019 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2019 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale