P. v. Esquivias SC
As the Court of Appeal explained, “[i]n Padilla, the question was the effect of an earlier order on a habeas corpus petition that had already vacated the defendant’s entire sentence (Padilla, supra, 13 Cal.5th at p. 158); here, the question is whether a court is required to vacate the entire sentence in the first place.” (Esquivias, supra¸ 103 Cal.App.5th
Comments on P. v. Esquivias SC