Patel v. Patel CA1/3
This matter arises from a dispute over profit distributions in a hotel business run by husband and wife Abdul Rashid Patel and Zarin Patel (collectively, “respondents”) and Abdul’s nephew Nasir Patel.1 Respondents filed an action against Nasir, which included direct and derivative claims for violation of Penal Code section 496 and breach of fiduciary duty, and a direct claim for elder abuse, among others. After a 14-day bench trial, the
Comments on Patel v. Patel CA1/3