P. v. Mabon
Defendant appeals his conviction by jury verdict of first degree murder, possession of a firearm by a felon, and evading a police officer. The jury also found true the allegation that he personally used and discharged a firearm during the murder. Defendant contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not request CALJIC No. 3.20, which instructs the jury to view the testimony of an in-custody informant with caution, or CALJIC No. 2.60, which instructs the jury on the defendant’s right not to testify. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Mabon