In re Erick M.
Erick M. appeals from the juvenile court’s order declaring him a ward of the court after finding he had committed misdemeanor vandalism. Erick contends, and the Attorney General concedes, he was improperly ordered to provide a DNA[1] sample as a condition of probation. We strike that portion of the juvenile court’s order and otherwise affirm.

Comments on In re Erick M.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced