P. v. Gomez
We appointed counsel to represent Florencio Tecomulara Gomez on appeal. Counsel filed a brief that set forth the facts of the case. Counsel did not argue against his client but advised the court no issues were found to argue on his behalf. Gomez was given 30 days to file written argument on his own behalf. That period has passed, and we have received no communication from him. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, to assist the court in conducting its independent review, counsel set forth the facts and possible issues. Court have reviewed the possible issues cited by counsel and have independently examined the record. Court found no arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Gomez