P. v. Gomez































Filed 10/14/10 P. v. Gomez CA4/3















NOT TO BE
PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE




>

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FLORENCIO TECOMULARA GOMEZ, Defendant and Appellant.

G043341 (Super. Ct. No. 09CF1813) O P I N I O N

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange
County, Deborah J. Chuang, Judge. Affirmed.

James R. Bostwick, Jr., under appointment by
the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and
Respondent.



We appointed counsel to represent Florencio Tecomulara
Gomez on appeal. Counsel filed a brief
that set forth the facts of the case.
Counsel did not argue against his client but advised the court no issues
were found to argue on his behalf. Gomez
was given 30 days to file written argument on his own behalf. That period has passed, and we have received
no communication from him.

Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, to assist the court in
conducting its independent review,
counsel set forth the facts and possible issues. We have reviewed the possible issues cited by
counsel and have independently examined the record. We found no arguable issues. (People
v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We
affirm the judgment.

FACTS

Officer Gonzalo Garcia and other officers
searched Gomez's apartment in Santa Ana. In the course of a search of the bedroom
Gomez was using, officers found $7,900 in cash, a small blue notebook, and
documents with Gomez's name and address on them. Names, dollar amounts, and the Spanish words
for â€