In re Christian T.
Tomson T. (father) appeals from the order terminating reunification services concerning his son Christian T. at a six-month review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e). He contends the dependency court lacked jurisdiction to terminate reunification services for him because it continued services for Christians mother. Fathers contention is mistaken, as the dependency court has discretion under section 366.21, subdivision (e) to terminate services for one parent while continuing services for the other parent. Accordingly, Court affirm the order.
Comments on In re Christian T.