legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Christian T.
Tomson T. (father) appeals from the order terminating reunification services concerning his son Christian T. at a six-month review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e). He contends the dependency court lacked jurisdiction to terminate reunification services for him because it continued services for Christians mother. Fathers contention is mistaken, as the dependency court has discretion under section 366.21, subdivision (e) to terminate services for one parent while continuing services for the other parent. Accordingly, Court affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale