CA Pub. Decisions

1. FOREST WATCH v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of fore. Part-II
   Aug 19, 2010
   This case presents the issue of what constitutes a â€
2. KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. SUPERIOR
   Aug 19, 2010
   Petitioner Kern County Department of Human Services (department) petitions for a writ of mandate after respondent Kern County Superior Court (juvenile court) refused to find the department properly noticed a parent of a jurisdictional/dispositional hearing on juvenile dependency …
3. KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY
   Aug 19, 2010
   A modification decision.
4. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-I
   Aug 19, 2010
   Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
5. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-II
   Aug 19, 2010
   Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
6. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-III
   Aug 19, 2010
   Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
7. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-IV
   Aug 19, 2010
   Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
8. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-V
   Aug 19, 2010
   Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
9. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-VI
   Aug 19, 2010
   Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
10. PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-VII
    Aug 19, 2010
    Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen.…
11. PEOPLE v. BRADY PART-I
    Aug 19, 2010
    A jury convicted defendant Roger Hoan Brady of the first degree murder of Officer Martin Ganz of the Manhattan Beach Police Department. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.)[1] It found true special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed against a peace officer e…
12. PEOPLE v. BRADY Part-II
    Aug 19, 2010
    A jury convicted defendant Roger Hoan Brady of the first degree murder of Officer Martin Ganz of the Manhattan Beach Police Department. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.)[1] It found true special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed against a peace officer e…
13. PEOPLE v. BRADY Part-III
    Aug 19, 2010
    A jury convicted defendant Roger Hoan Brady of the first degree murder of Officer Martin Ganz of the Manhattan Beach Police Department. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.)[1] It found true special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed against a peace officer e…
14. PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-I
    Aug 19, 2010
    A San Bernardino County jury found defendant Martin Carl Jennings guilty of the first degree murder of his five-year-old son, Arthur Jennings. (Pen. Code, § 187.)[1] The jury further found true the special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction …
15. PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-II
    Aug 19, 2010
    A San Bernardino County jury found defendant Martin Carl Jennings guilty of the first degree murder of his five-year-old son, Arthur Jennings. (Pen. Code, § 187.)[1] The jury further found true the special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction …
16. PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-III
    Aug 19, 2010
    A San Bernardino County jury found defendant Martin Carl Jennings guilty of the first degree murder of his five-year-old son, Arthur Jennings. (Pen. Code, § 187.)[1] The jury further found true the special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction …
17. PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-IV
    Aug 19, 2010
    A San Bernardino County jury found defendant Martin Carl Jennings guilty of the first degree murder of his five-year-old son, Arthur Jennings. (Pen. Code, § 187.)[1] The jury further found true the special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction …
18. PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-V
    Aug 19, 2010
    A San Bernardino County jury found defendant Martin Carl Jennings guilty of the first degree murder of his five-year-old son, Arthur Jennings. (Pen. Code, § 187.)[1] The jury further found true the special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction …
19. PEOPLE v. JENNINGS Part-VI
    Aug 19, 2010
    A San Bernardino County jury found defendant Martin Carl Jennings guilty of the first degree murder of his five-year-old son, Arthur Jennings. (Pen. Code, § 187.)[1] The jury further found true the special circumstance that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction …
20. KWEI LU v. HAWAIIAN GARDENS CASINO, INC
    Aug 19, 2010
    Labor Code[1] section 351 prohibits employers from taking any gratuity patrons leave for their employees, and declares that such gratuity is â€