PEOPLE v. COX Part-II
<script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-1698443-1"; urchinTracker(); </script> <html ><br /> <head><br /> <title>PEOPLE v</title><br /> </head><br /> <body><br /> <div><br /> <br/><b >PEOPLE v. COX</b><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Filed 8/10/10<br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u> </u><br /> <br/><u>CERTIFIED<br /> FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION</u><u><sup>*</sup></u><br /> <br/><b<br /> > </b><br /> <br/>IN<br /> THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>SECOND<br /> APPELLATE DISTRICT<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>DIVISION<br /> FIVE<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0<br /> ><br /> <tr ><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/>THE<br /> PEOPLE,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Plaintiff and Respondent,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> v.<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>JAMIE<br /> D. COX et al.,<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> Defendants and Appellants.<br /> <br/> <br /> </td><br /> <td width=319 valign=top ><br /> <br/> B207285<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> (Los Angeles County<br /> <br/> Super. Ct. No. TA088018)<br /> </td><br /> </tr><br /> </table><br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/> <br /> <br/><b >STORY CONTINUE FROM <br /> PART II….</b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/><b > </b><br /> <br/>B. Accomplice Instructions<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>1. Factual and procedural background<br /> <br/> <br /> <br/>Defendants argue that the trial<br /> court improperly failed to instruct the jury sua sponte with CALCRIM No. 334<sup><sup>[1]</sup></sup> regarding accomplice testimony. During the discussions between the trial<br /> court and counsel regarding jury instructions, the prosecutor indicated that<br /> CALCRIM No. 334 had been withdrawn as inapplicable. Ms. Trotter, counsel for Mr. Jackson,<br /> stated she wanted this instruction to be given. <br /> The trial court responded, â€