legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Simpson Strong-Tie v. Gore

Simpson Strong-Tie v. Gore
05:12:2008



Simpson Strong-Tie v. Gore



Filed 4/30/08 Simpson Strong-Tie v. Gore CA6



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY, INC.,



Plaintiff and Appellant,



v.



PIERCE GORE et al.,



Defendants and Respondents.



H031110



(Santa Clara County



Super. Ct. No. CV057666)



Background and Discussion



This is an appeal from an order of attorney fees made after the trial court granted respondents anti-SLAPP motion. Appellant states that [t]he sole basis for this appeal is the anticipated reversal of the underlying judgment and order in the companion appeal, Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. Gore (Apr. 30, 2008, H030444) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. In that matter we have this day affirmed the underlying judgment and order. Accordingly the sole basis for the present appeal fails.




Disposition



The order awarding fees is affirmed.



______________________________________



RUSHING, P.J.



WE CONCUR:



____________________________________



PREMO, J.



____________________________________



ELIA, J.



Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.



Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line Lawyers.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description This is an appeal from an order of attorney fees made after the trial court granted respondents anti-SLAPP motion. Appellant states that [t]he sole basis for this appeal is the anticipated reversal of the underlying judgment and order in the companion appeal, Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. Gore (Apr. 30, 2008, H030444) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. In that matter we have this day affirmed the underlying judgment and order. Accordingly the sole basis for the present appeal fails.
The order awarding fees is affirmed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale