legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ledesma CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Ledesma CA2/6
By
12:26:2017

Filed 10/24/17 P. v. Ledesma CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FRANCISCO LEDESMA,

Defendant and Appellant

2d Crim. No. B281005

(Super. Ct. No. 2016009303)

(Ventura County)

Francisco Ledesma appeals the judgment entered after he pled guilty to inflicting corporal injury on a girlfriend (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and admitted allegations he had suffered a prior strike conviction (id., §§ 667, 1170.12) and had served five prior prison terms (id., § 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced him to three years in state prison, imposed various fines and fees, and awarded him 864 days of presentence custody credit.

A witness saw appellant punch a woman and throw her to the ground. The witness called the police. The responding officer recognized the victim as appellant’s girlfriend and observed scratches and redness on her body.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

On June 20, 2017, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has been received.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

YEGAN, J.

Gilbert A. Romero, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner and Richard B. Lennon under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.





Description Francisco Ledesma appeals the judgment entered after he pled guilty to inflicting corporal injury on a girlfriend (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and admitted allegations he had suffered a prior strike conviction (id., §§ 667, 1170.12) and had served five prior prison terms (id., § 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced him to three years in state prison, imposed various fines and fees, and awarded him 864 days of presentence custody credit.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 9 views. Averaging 9 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale