P. v. Flowers
Filed 6/19/08 P. v. Flowers CA2/7
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHANIEL FLOWERS, Defendant and Appellant. | B199692 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA280488) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT |
THE COURT*:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 10, 2008, and not certified for publication, be modified as follows:
On page 11, the third full paragraph concludes with the sentence: Thus, given the nature and amount of this gang evidence at issue, relative to the other evidence, presented at trial, we are convinced under either the state or federal standards of prejudicial error that reversal is warranted.
It should read: Thus, given the nature and amount of this gang evidence at issue, relative to the other evidence, presented at trial, we are convinced under either the state or federal standards of prejudicial error that reversal is unwarranted.
The foregoing does not effect a change in the judgment.
________________________________________________________________________
*PERLUSS, P.J. WOODS, J. ZELON, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.
Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com
