In re Michael M.
Filed 12/31/09 In re Michael M. CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
In re Michael M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B216963 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. JJ16612) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL M., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Donna Groman, Judge. Affirmed.
Bruce G. Finebaum, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On February 6, 2009, Joel L. was walking on the campus of Fremont High School in Los Angeles when he was approached by Herbert P., who blocked Joel L.s path, held a knife to his stomach, and asked Joel L. what he had in his pockets. Michael M. then approached Joel L. and tried to take an IPod out of Joel L.s pocket. Joel L. took it out and gave it to him. Joel L. told Michael M. he was going to keep the earphones, and Michael M. said that was okay but not to say anything. Herbert P. and Michael M. then left.
The trial court found true an allegation of one felony count of second degree robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211. The court declared Michael M. to be a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 and a ward of the court, ordered Michael M. be placed home on probation, and gave him 22 days of predisposition custody credit. Michael M. filed a timely notice of appeal.
We appointed counsel to represent Michael M. on appeal. After examining the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to independently review the record. On November 4, 2009, we advised Michael M. he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. To date, we have received no response.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that Michael M.s counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109110; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
JOHNSON, J.
We concur:
MALLANO, P. J.
ROTHSCHILD, J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
