Advanced Development Holdings v. Brea Canon Oil Co.




Filed 1/4/11 Advanced Development Holdings v. Brea Canon Oil Co. CA2/4





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS, INC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BREA CAÑON OIL COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Respondent.	B216117 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC352166) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT:*
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 14, 2010 be modified as follows: On page 30, line 4, after the sentence ending with the words “Oakhorne lot,” add the following footnote (footnote 17):
For the reasons elaborated above, we also conclude that the trial court properly directed a verdict on Smith Heavy’s claims in the TAC for quiet title, nuisance, and injunctive relief regarding the A-4 drill site (which were not resolved in connection with Brea’s motion for summary adjudication), as these were predicated on the contention that the expiration of the ground leases concerning the site terminated Brea’s right to conduct its operations on the site.
Appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied. The modification does not change the judgment.













_________________________________________________________________
*WILLHITE, Acting P. J., MANELLA, J., SUZUKAWA, J.