Escamilla v. Maddox CA4/3
Daniel Escamilla appeals from a prefiling order and an order dismissing his case for failure to post security. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 391.4, 391.7; undesignated statutory references are to this code.) On appeal, he argues the trial court erred by (1) determining he was a vexatious litigant pursuant to section 391; (2) disallowing his testimony at a hearing on a motion pursuant to sections 391.1 and 391.7; (3) failing to apply collateral
Comments on Escamilla v. Maddox CA4/3