P. v. Hayes CA2/1
Christopher Hayes appeals from a judgment of conviction, challenging his sentence. We resolve this appeal by memorandum opinion because his contentions of sentencing error “raise no substantial issues of law or fact.” (Cal. Stds. Jud. Admin., § 8.1.) On January 31, 2025, a jury found Hayes guilty of six offenses, which he committed while in state prison serving a sentence in another matter: aggravated battery, committed by “gassing” upo
Comments on P. v. Hayes CA2/1