P. v. Templar CA4/1
Ellis Templar appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for mental health diversion. He argues the evidence did not support the trial court’s finding that he posed an unreasonable risk to public safety. Templar further contends the trial court erred in using its residual discretion to deny mental health diversion. We find the trial court’s public safety risk determination supported by substantial evidence. We therefore affirm on th
Comments on P. v. Templar CA4/1