P. v. Quintanilla CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Appellant Marco Quintanilla challenges his convictions for second degree murder, possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, and possession of ammunition by a prohibited person. He claims that the trial court erred by declining to instruct on voluntary manslaughter based on heat of passion. He also claims that CALCRIM No. 372 is unconstitutional because it
Comments on P. v. Quintanilla CA2/3