P. v. Fulgenzi CA4/3
William Russell Fulgenzi, Jr., appeals after a jury found him guilty of one count each of evading while driving recklessly and resisting and obstructing an officer. The trial court found true Fulgenzi suffered a prior strike conviction. Fulgenzi argues the trial court erred by instructing the jury with a modified version of CALCRIM No. 372 on a defendant’s flight. We agree the trial court erred by so instructing the jury but, for the re
Comments on P. v. Fulgenzi CA4/3