Gretzky v. Grant Shenon CA2/3
We review the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion. That motion was brought in response to a complaint for malicious prosecution, which in turn was a response to two underlying fraud cases. We affirm the order of the trial court.

Comments on Gretzky v. Grant Shenon CA2/3

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced