Dima v. Grasshopper House CA2/3
Plaintiff and appellant Dima, LLC (Dima) failed timely to respond to requests for admission (RFAs) served by defendants and respondents Grasshopper House, LLC and its surety, Federal Recovery Systems, LLC (together, Grasshopper). The court granted Grasshopper’s motion to deem the RFAs admitted under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280.1 Dima filed three separate motions for relief from the order, which the court denied. The court g

Comments on Dima v. Grasshopper House CA2/3

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced