Kiker v. Pilch CA2/8
Two doctors feuded, settled, then feuded about their settlement. An arbitrator rejected one of the doctors’ claims that the other doctor had breached their settlement agreement. The trial court confirmed the award. It concluded the arbitrator’s interpretation of the doctors’ settlement agreement was rational. It also concluded the arbitrator’s findings — that the doctor asserting breach had waived those breaches and failed to prove
Comments on Kiker v. Pilch CA2/8