P. v. Baltazar CA1/4
A jury convicted defendant Jose Figeroa Baltazar of, among other things, willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder. Defendant’s main contentions on appeal are: (1) the evidence was insufficient for the jury to find that the attempted murder was willful, deliberate, and premeditated; (2) giving the jury an instruction on voluntary intoxication (CALCRIM No. 3426) along with instructions related to consciousness of guilt (CALCR
Comments on P. v. Baltazar CA1/4