Tucker v. Hawley CA1/4
Appellant Steve Hawley, respondent below, argues we must reverse the trial court’s issuance of a three-year civil restraining order for the protection of Leonard Tucker, Jr. and his fiancée because the trial court (1) applied an overbroad interpretation of Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6; (2) improperly included third party workers as protected parties; (3) prejudicially erred by admitting video evidence that was not authenticated
Comments on Tucker v. Hawley CA1/4