legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.M. CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ L.J. (father) and Brittany M. (mother) appeal from an order terminating dependency jurisdiction and placing their daughter M. in a legal guardianship. The parents contend that the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying their request to continue the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing, and terminating juvenile court jurisdiction without

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale