legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Adam CA1/4
Powers, confirmed the November 21, 2024, trial and continued the section 1382 motion to that date for Judge Nisperos to decide “because she’s the trial judge.” On November 21, 2024, the Honorable Judge Marlo S. Nisperos heard and denied the section 1382 motion to dismiss. At the hearing, the People argued that Adam was not prejudiced because Adam was out of custody. Adam argued the People’s

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale