P. v. Velasquez CA4/3
Defendant Frank John Velasquez challenges his conviction for street terrorism at the second phase of a bifurcated jury trial. He claims his acquittal of attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon at the first phase of trial barred his second-phase conviction, citing double jeopardy and issue preclusion. Alternatively, he contends the trial court abused its discretion by declining to strike his prior strike offenses at sentencing.
Comments on P. v. Velasquez CA4/3