File 9/18/26 Kuigoua v. Sacks CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff and appellant Arno Kuigoua sued his former attorney, Adam Michael Sacks, settled the case, then sued Sacks again. The trial court rejected Kuigoua’s procedural challenges to Sacks’s demurrer and sustained it without leave to amend, concluding the action was barred by preclusion. On appeal, Kuigoua contends the trial court erred by sustaining the demurrer and that several procedural
Comments on File 9/18/26 Kuigoua v. Sacks CA2/3