P. v. Ramos CA4/1
Thus we affirm. Ramos’s first contention is that the prosecution engaged in vindictive prosecution and that the trial court erred in denying a motion seeking relief on this basis. To understand this contention it is necessary to be apprised of the manner in which the counts alleged against Ramos in this case evolved over time. A. Evolution of the Charges 1. The Complaint and the Original Information Ramos was first charged, in December
Comments on P. v. Ramos CA4/1