P. v. Flemming CA3
A jury found defendant Jonathan Flemming guilty of first degree murder after a trial at which he testified in his own defense. On appeal, Flemming argues that the trial court erred in two respects when it allowed the prosecution to impeach his testimony with evidence of his prior juvenile adjudications. First, he claims that, while the conduct underlying a juvenile adjudication may be used to impeach, the fact of a juvenile adjudication
Comments on P. v. Flemming CA3