In re X.M. CA2/5
A.F. (Father) is the father of a five-year-old daughter, X.M. (Minor).1 The juvenile court assumed dependency jurisdiction over Minor because it found Father’s alcohol abuse and his history of domestic violence with Minor’s mother A.M. (Mother) placed Minor at substantial risk of suffering serious physical harm. The court also ordered Minor removed from Father’s custody. We consider whether substantial evidence supports the
Comments on In re X.M. CA2/5