P. v. Strange CA4/3
Defendant Cynthia Roberta Strange appeals her conviction for first degree murder, asserting the trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial on the grounds of jury misconduct. Finding no error, we affirm.
P. v. Strange CA4/3
Defendant Cynthia Roberta Strange appeals her conviction for first degree murder, asserting the trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial on the grounds of jury misconduct. Finding no error, we affirm.
Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Strange CA4/3