legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pacas CA2/1
We find no merit to Pacas’s other arguments. California courts have rejected similar challenges to those made by Pacas to CSAAS evidence. California courts have also rejected at least two of the challenges to CALCRIM No. 1193 that Pacas raises, and Pacas does not otherwise persuade us that the instruction was erroneous. We also conclude that there is no reasonable likelihood that the court’s comments to the venire about reasonable doubt

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale