S.K. v. Papazyan CA2/2
Lilit Papazyan (Papazyan) appeals from a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) issued against her protecting S.K,1 pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA; Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.).2 Papazyan contends the trial court erred in excluding a Ring doorbell camera video (Ring video) because she failed to provide a transcript, as required by California Rules of Court, rule 2.1040.3 We affirm.
Comments on S.K. v. Papazyan CA2/2