LS Carlson Law v. Sedgwick CA4/3
Plaintiff LS Carlson Law appeals from an order granting an anti- SLAPP motion striking its complaint. It claims a former client’s Yelp review is not protected and, in any event, it showed a probability of prevailing on its defamation and contract claims. We conclude the Yelp review criticizing the law firm is a protected statement in a public forum on an issue of public interest. We further hold the firm has not shown a probability of p
Comments on LS Carlson Law v. Sedgwick CA4/3