P. v. Kazemi CA2/8
Jalal Kazemi, through his appointed attorney, seeks reversal of his criminal conviction on the sole ground that the trial court erroneously refused to declare a second doubt regarding his competency to stand trial. We now affirm the judgment, because Kazemi’s conduct following his first competency evaluation did not present a substantial change of circumstances or new evidence that required revisiting competency.
Comments on P. v. Kazemi CA2/8